By Gregory Klass, George Letsas, Prince Saprai
Within the final ten years, there was a revival of curiosity within the philosophical learn of agreement legislation. a lot of the dialogue relates again to Charles Fried's 1981 declare that agreement legislations is predicated at the philosophy of promise, producing what's at the present time referred to as 'the agreement and promise debate'. This quantity faucets into this renewal of curiosity by means of bringing jointly major philosophers, felony theorists, and contract attorneys to debate the philosophical foundations of this sector of law. Read more...
summary: within the final ten years, there was a revival of curiosity within the philosophical learn of agreement legislation. a lot of the dialogue relates again to Charles Fried's 1981 declare that agreement legislation relies at the philosophy of promise, producing what's this present day often called 'the agreement and promise debate'. This quantity faucets into this renewal of curiosity by means of bringing jointly major philosophers, criminal theorists, and agreement attorneys to debate the philosophical foundations of this region of legislations
Read Online or Download Philosophical foundations of contract law PDF
Best legal theory & systems books
BOOKS IN SPANISH
Social paintings and the Courts is a compendium of the latest and significant felony instances in social paintings and social welfare. Its dissection and research of an important situations makes it a great device for instructing social employees to appreciate the criminal approach and its operation. The publication demonstrates how courts view and care for the functionality, motion, and behavior of social staff and their companies.
Estate legislation and Social Morality develops a conception of estate that highlights the social development of responsibilities that folks owe one another. through viewing estate legislations in the course of the lens of responsibilities instead of in the course of the lens of rights, the writer affirms the lifestyles of significant estate rights (when no legal responsibility to a different exists) and defines the scope of these rights (when a duty to a different does exist).
- Property and Justice
- The Hart-Fuller Debate in the Twenty-First Century
- Law, Virtue and Justice
- From Normativity to responsibility
- Natural Law in Jurisprudence and Politics
- From positivism to idealism: a study of the moral dimensions of legality
Extra resources for Philosophical foundations of contract law
2d 118 (Wis. 1997) (refusing to enforce a contract that was “void as against public policy”). This supposed divergence mirrors the well-known difference between act and rule utilitarianism and the controversy whether rule breaking can ever in the long run be truly for the best. 31 William Shakespeare, The Merchant of Venice act 3, scene 3 (Jay L. , Clarendon Press 1993) (1600). 32 Economists claim this shows that the law is more practical than moral: the law recognizes that a less rigid rule promotes social utility by encouraging a promisor to make the highest and best use of his resources, while awarding the disappointed promisee a money equivalent no greater than the worth of the promised performance.
J. 1261 (1980). 26 Charles Fried prior to the date of delivery, Third Party offers Seller $25 per gross for immediate delivery to him of the widgets. Buyer will have to pay $15 per gross for the widgets from another manufacturer and will lose $5 in lost sales for each gross as a result of the delay. Economists reason that Seller should sell the widgets to Third Party and pay Buyer the $5-per-gross difference in the price of the replacement widgets plus the $5 per gross in lost gizmo sales. Buyer will be no worse off financially than if Seller had faithfully performed, while Seller will be $5 per gross better off, which is roughly equivalent to the additional value to society created by Third Party receiving the early delivery of the widgets—the extra value exists because Third Party valued the widgets more than Buyer.
24 That the two should arrive at similar conclusions on many of the main points of contract doctrine25 is striking. Differences come to the fore when the issue is the effect of social arrangements on the overall welfare of groups,26 as opposed to the joint welfare of two contracting parties. The convergence is particularly salient in the design of institutions that facilitate the coordination, through agreements, of the energies of otherwise independent persons. Legal regimes by their nature are concerned with institutional design, and both the Kantian and utilitarian perspectives focus on maximizing the preferences of individuals ex ante;27 that is, the two perspectives focus on the design of legal regimes and doctrines that collaborating individuals would themselves see as furthering the purposes they hope to achieve in their free collaboration.